Compare commits

...

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
fiatjaf
e162a2203e add individual pay-per-view events as a future possibility. 2025-12-12 13:52:53 -03:00
fiatjaf
6eaad3b384 fix grammar and clarify future stuff. 2025-12-12 01:41:02 -03:00
fiatjaf
404db206e6 add optional announcement with payment url. 2025-12-11 14:07:01 -03:00
fiatjaf
da78797d12 paywall/premium content. 2025-12-11 13:52:35 -03:00

83
63.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
NIP-63
======
Relay-based Paywalls
--------------------
`draft` `optional`
This NIP specifies how relays can support _paywalled content_. Well, "paywall" is a misnomer as this NIP doesn't imply payment necessarily, it's agnostic about that, so better call it **premium content**.
The idea is that a _content-creator_ should be able to manage a list of _premium-reader_ who have access to their premium content, then choose some specific relays to publish their content based on their known support for this NIP.
Relays that support this NIP (as they could indicate in their [NIP-11](11.md) responses) should receive the list of users and use it together with [NIP-42](42.md) authentication in order to decide what content will be readable by each requester.
### Premium event
Any event can be premium, all it needs is a [NIP-70](70.md) `["-"]` tag and another tag `["nip63"]` that clearly indicates its situation.
Because normal relays won't care about these tags it's enough for the _content-creator_ to release the event to these relays in order to make it "public" to everybody.
### Membership Event
Membership events must be sent directly to the relays that will implement the paywall. By default relays should not serve these events to anyone, only to the _content-creator_ directly. Because of this, these lists can be kept reasonably private as long as the _content-creator_ is discreet in his publishing, but can also be made public by being published to other relays.
The lists are constituted of one event for each _premium-reader_, and their removal/update must be done with a [NIP-09](09.md) deletion request.
```yaml
{
"kind": 1163,
"pubkey": "<content-creator>",
"tags": [
["p", "<premium-reader>"]
],
// ...other fields
}
```
### Relay behavior
A relay that implements this NIP should:
- signal `63` in its `supported_nips` NIP-11 field;
- accept `kind:1163` events and not serve them to anyone except to their creator;
- accept deletion requests for such events;
- accept premium events containing `["-"]` and `["nip63"]` tags only from their creator;
- only serve the premium events to users that have a matching `kind:1163`;
- serve an `AUTH` challenge to any client opening a connection immediately.
### Client behavior
A client doesn't have to do much in order to access premium content: if a client is already very liberal with its authentication policies it will automatically perform NIP-42 AUTH whenever it connects to the relay; otherwise it may want to check if such relay supports `63` before deciding.
After that, any `REQ`s should include premium content automatically and transparently. This means that while constructiing a normal "following" feed a client will get the premium content automatically and place it in front of the user.
A client may decide to display these events differently if they have the `["nip63"]` tag.
### Announcement
Optionally a _content-creator_ can announce that they have premium content available by publishing an event:
```
{
"kind": 10163,
"content": "<something about the premium content, the price and other stuff, optionally>",
"tags": [
["url", "<payment-page-url>"]
]
}
```
Where `<payment-page-url>` is a normal webpage that may have anything in it. From there on, payments are handled off-protocol. The entity that handled the payment is expected to somehow modify the list of _premium-readers_ or enable the user to modify it later.
#### Zap relationship
This NIP is payment agnostic, but that doesn't mean one shouldn't use zaps or nutzaps for this. Clients or third-party services may offer a feature to read all zaps, compute their sums according to any criteria and use that information to modify the list of _premium-readers_.
### Future additions
- more private list membership: perhaps doing an HMAC with the public key of the reader and a key that is shared with the relays will be enough for this.
- tiered membership: custom tiers for fine-grained content access control can be added by adding a tag like `["tier", "a"]` to the `kind:1163` event and using a `["nip63", "a"]` tag in the events, for example.
- teaser events: perhaps a `["nip63", "", "-"]` (negative) tag could cause an event to be displayed only to those that do not have access to its premium counterpart, this would also be managed by the relay.
- relays for premium content different from the outbox relays?
- individual "pay-per-view" content.