update lists table

22.md

@@ -13,9 +13,6 @@ It uses `kind:1111` with plaintext `.content` (no HTML, Markdown, or other forma
 Comments MUST point to the root scope using uppercase tag names (e.g. `K`, `E`, `A` or `I`)
 and MUST point to the parent item with lowercase ones (e.g. `k`, `e`, `a` or `i`).
 
-Comments MUST point to the authors when one is available (i.e. tagging a nostr event). `P` for the root scope
-and `p` for the author of the parent item.
-
 ```jsonc
 {
   kind: 1111,
@@ -26,16 +23,10 @@ and `p` for the author of the parent item.
     // the root item kind
     ["K", "<root kind>"],
 
-    // pubkey of the author of the root scope event
-    ["P", "<root-pubkey>", "relay-url-hint"],
-
     // parent item: event addresses, event ids, or i-tags.
     ["<a, e, i>", "<address, id or i-value>", "<relay or web page hint>", "<parent event's pubkey, if an e tag>"],
     // parent item kind
-    ["k", "<parent comment kind>"],
-
-    // parent item pubkey
-    ["p", "<parent-pubkey>", "relay-url-hint"]
+    ["k", "<parent comment kind>"]
   ]
   // other fields
 }
@@ -55,6 +46,11 @@ Their uppercase versions use the same type of values but relate to the root item
 ```
 
 `p` tags SHOULD be used when mentioning pubkeys in the `.content` with [NIP-21](21.md).
+If the parent item is an event, a `p` tag set to the parent event's author SHOULD be added.
+
+```json
+["p", "<pubkey>", "<relay-url>"]
+```
 
 ## Examples
 
@@ -69,17 +65,13 @@ A comment on a blog post looks like this:
     ["A", "30023:3c9849383bdea883b0bd16fece1ed36d37e37cdde3ce43b17ea4e9192ec11289:f9347ca7", "wss://example.relay"],
     // the root kind
     ["K", "30023"],
-    // author of root event
-    ["P", "3c9849383bdea883b0bd16fece1ed36d37e37cdde3ce43b17ea4e9192ec11289", "wss://example.relay"]
 
     // the parent event address (same as root for top-level comments)
     ["a", "30023:3c9849383bdea883b0bd16fece1ed36d37e37cdde3ce43b17ea4e9192ec11289:f9347ca7", "wss://example.relay"],
     // when the parent event is replaceable or addressable, also include an `e` tag referencing its id
     ["e", "5b4fc7fed15672fefe65d2426f67197b71ccc82aa0cc8a9e94f683eb78e07651", "wss://example.relay"],
     // the parent event kind
-    ["k", "30023"],
-    // author of the parent event
-    ["p", "3c9849383bdea883b0bd16fece1ed36d37e37cdde3ce43b17ea4e9192ec11289", "wss://example.relay"]
+    ["k", "30023"]
   ]
   // other fields
 }
@@ -96,14 +88,11 @@ A comment on a [NIP-94](94.md) file looks like this:
     ["E", "768ac8720cdeb59227cf95e98b66560ef03d8bc9a90d721779e76e68fb42f5e6", "wss://example.relay", "3721e07b079525289877c366ccab47112bdff3d1b44758ca333feb2dbbbbe5bb"],
     // the root kind
     ["K", "1063"],
-    // author of the root event
-    ["P", "3721e07b079525289877c366ccab47112bdff3d1b44758ca333feb2dbbbbe5bb"],
 
     // the parent event id (same as root for top-level comments)
     ["e", "768ac8720cdeb59227cf95e98b66560ef03d8bc9a90d721779e76e68fb42f5e6", "wss://example.relay", "3721e07b079525289877c366ccab47112bdff3d1b44758ca333feb2dbbbbe5bb"],
     // the parent kind
-    ["k", "1063"],
-    ["p", "3721e07b079525289877c366ccab47112bdff3d1b44758ca333feb2dbbbbe5bb"]
+    ["k", "1063"]
   ]
   // other fields
 }
@@ -120,13 +109,11 @@ A reply to a comment looks like this:
     ["E", "768ac8720cdeb59227cf95e98b66560ef03d8bc9a90d721779e76e68fb42f5e6", "wss://example.relay", "fd913cd6fa9edb8405750cd02a8bbe16e158b8676c0e69fdc27436cc4a54cc9a"],
     // the root kind
     ["K", "1063"],
-    ["P", "fd913cd6fa9edb8405750cd02a8bbe16e158b8676c0e69fdc27436cc4a54cc9a"],
 
     // the parent event
     ["e", "5c83da77af1dec6d7289834998ad7aafbd9e2191396d75ec3cc27f5a77226f36", "wss://example.relay", "93ef2ebaaf9554661f33e79949007900bbc535d239a4c801c33a4d67d3e7f546"],
     // the parent kind
-    ["k", "1111"],
-    ["p", "93ef2ebaaf9554661f33e79949007900bbc535d239a4c801c33a4d67d3e7f546"]
+    ["k", "1111"]
   ]
   // other fields
 }
@@ -191,9 +178,7 @@ A reply to a podcast comment:
     ["e", "80c48d992a38f9c445b943a9c9f1010b396676013443765750431a9004bdac05", "wss://example.relay", "252f10c83610ebca1a059c0bae8255eba2f95be4d1d7bcfa89d7248a82d9f111"],
     // the parent comment kind
     ["k", "1111"]
-    ["p", "252f10c83610ebca1a059c0bae8255eba2f95be4d1d7bcfa89d7248a82d9f111"]
   ]
   // other fields
 }
 ```
-

23.md

@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ Long-form Content
 
 `draft` `optional`
 
-This NIP defines `kind:30023` (an _addressable event_) for long-form text content, generally referred to as "articles" or "blog posts". `kind:30024` has the same structure as `kind:30023` and is used to save long form drafts.
+This NIP defines `kind:30023` (an _addressable event_) for long-form text content, generally referred to as "articles" or "blog posts".
+
+Deprecated: `kind:30024` was used for long-form drafts (self-encrypted nip04, same format as `kind:30023`). The preferred way of doing long-form drafts is to use [NIP-37](37.md) instead.
 
 "Social" clients that deal primarily with `kind:1` notes should not be expected to implement this NIP.
 

32.md

@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ considered open for public use, and not proprietary. In other words, if there is
 namespace that fits your use case, use it even if it points to someone else's domain name.
 
 Vocabularies MAY choose to fully qualify all labels within a namespace (for example,
-`["l", "com.example.vocabulary:my-label"]`). This may be preferred when defining more
+`["l", "com.example.vocabulary:my-label"]`. This may be preferred when defining more
 formal vocabularies that should not be confused with another namespace when querying
 without an `L` tag. For these vocabularies, all labels SHOULD include the namespace
 (rather than mixing qualified and unqualified labels).
@@ -173,4 +173,4 @@ Appendix: Known Ontologies
 
 Below is a non-exhaustive list of ontologies currently in widespread use.
 
-- [social ontology categories](https://github.com/CLARIAH/awesome-humanities-ontologies)
+- [social.ontolo.categories](https://ontolo.social/)

37.md

@@ -30,6 +30,19 @@ A blanked `.content` means this draft has been deleted by a client but relays st
 
 Tags `e` and `a` identify one or more anchor events, such as parent events on replies.   
 
+## Checkpoints
+`kind:1234` defines checkpoints that belong to a parent `kind:31234` event. These can serve to provide a revision history of a parent event.
+
+```js
+{
+  "kind": 1234,
+  "tags": [
+    ["a", "31234:<pubkey>:<identifier>"]
+  ],
+  "content": nip44Encrypt(JSON.stringify(draft_event)),
+}
+```
+
 ## Relay List for Private Content
 
 Kind `10013` indicates the user's preferred relays to store private events like Drafts. The event MUST include a list of `relay` URLs in private tags. Private tags are JSON Stringified, NIP-44-encrypted to the signer's keys and placed inside the .content of the event.

44.md

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Encrypted Payloads (Versioned)
 
 The NIP introduces a new data format for keypair-based encryption. This NIP is versioned
 to allow multiple algorithm choices to exist simultaneously. This format may be used for
-many things, but MUST be used in the context of a signed event as described in NIP-01.
+many things, but MUST be used in the context of a signed event as described in NIP 01.
 
 *Note*: this format DOES NOT define any `kind`s related to a new direct messaging standard,
 only the encryption required to define one. It SHOULD NOT be used as a drop-in replacement
-for NIP-04 payloads.
+for NIP 04 payloads.
 
 ## Versions
 
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ On its own, messages sent using this scheme have a number of important shortcomi
 - No post-compromise security: when a key is compromised, it is possible to decrypt all future conversations
 - No post-quantum security: a powerful quantum computer would be able to decrypt the messages
 - IP address leak: user IP may be seen by relays and all intermediaries between user and relay
-- Date leak: `created_at` is public, since it is a part of NIP-01 event
+- Date leak: `created_at` is public, since it is a part of NIP 01 event
 - Limited message size leak: padding only partially obscures true message length
 - No attachments: they are not supported
 
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ NIP-44 version 2 has the following design characteristics:
    - Content must be encoded from UTF-8 into byte array
    - Validate plaintext length. Minimum is 1 byte, maximum is 65535 bytes
    - Padding format is: `[plaintext_length: u16][plaintext][zero_bytes]`
-   - Padding algorithm is related to powers-of-two, with min padded msg size of 32 bytes
+   - Padding algorithm is related to powers-of-two, with min padded msg size of 32bytes
    - Plaintext length is encoded in big-endian as first 2 bytes of the padded blob
 5. Encrypt padded content
    - Use ChaCha20, with key and nonce from step 3
@@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ validation rules, refer to BIP-340.
   - `x[i:j]`, where `x` is a byte array and `i, j <= 0` returns a `(j - i)`-byte array with a copy of the
     `i`-th byte (inclusive) to the `j`-th byte (exclusive) of `x`.
 - Constants `c`:
-  - `min_plaintext_size` is 1. 1 byte msg is padded to 32 bytes.
-  - `max_plaintext_size` is 65535 (64kB - 1). It is padded to 65536 bytes.
+  - `min_plaintext_size` is 1. 1bytes msg is padded to 32bytes.
+  - `max_plaintext_size` is 65535 (64kB - 1). It is padded to 65536bytes.
 - Functions
   - `base64_encode(string)` and `base64_decode(bytes)` are Base64 ([RFC 4648](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4648), with padding)
   - `concat` refers to byte array concatenation

51.md

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ For example, _mute list_ can contain the public keys of spammers and bad actors
 | Blocked relays    | 10006 | relays clients should never connect to                      | `"relay"` (relay URLs)                                                            |
 | Search relays     | 10007 | relays clients should use when performing search queries    | `"relay"` (relay URLs)                                                            |
 | Simple groups     | 10009 | [NIP-29](29.md) groups the user is in                       | `"group"` ([NIP-29](29.md) group id + relay URL + optional group name), `"r"` for each relay in use     |
+| Draft relays      | 10013 | (nip44-encrypted) [NIP-37](37.md) draft relays              | `"relay"` (relay URL)                                                             |
 | Interests         | 10015 | topics a user may be interested in and pointers             | `"t"` (hashtags) and `"a"` (kind:30015 interest set)                              |
 | Emojis            | 10030 | user preferred emojis and pointers to emoji sets            | `"emoji"` (see [NIP-30](30.md)) and `"a"` (kind:30030 emoji set)                  |
 | DM relays         | 10050 | Where to receive [NIP-17](17.md) direct messages            | `"relay"` (see [NIP-17](17.md))                                                   |

94.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The purpose of this NIP is to allow an organization and classification of shared
 
 ## Event format
 
-This NIP specifies the use of the `1063` event kind, having in `content` a description of the file content, and a list of tags described below:
+This NIP specifies the use of the `1063` event type, having in `content` a description of the file content, and a list of tags described below:
 
 * `url` the url to download the file
 * `m` a string indicating the data type of the file. The [MIME types](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Basics_of_HTTP/MIME_types/Common_types) format must be used, and they should be lowercase.

README.md

@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
 - [NIP-39: External Identities in Profiles](39.md)
 - [NIP-40: Expiration Timestamp](40.md)
 - [NIP-42: Authentication of clients to relays](42.md)
-- [NIP-44: Encrypted Payloads (Versioned)](44.md)
+- [NIP-44: Versioned Encryption](44.md)
 - [NIP-45: Counting results](45.md)
-- [NIP-46: Nostr Remote Signing](46.md)
-- [NIP-47: Nostr Wallet Connect](47.md)
+- [NIP-46: Nostr Connect](46.md)
+- [NIP-47: Wallet Connect](47.md)
 - [NIP-48: Proxy Tags](48.md)
 - [NIP-49: Private Key Encryption](49.md)
 - [NIP-50: Search Capability](50.md)
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
 | `818`         | Merge Requests                  | [54](54.md)                            |
 | `1021`        | Bid                             | [15](15.md)                            |
 | `1022`        | Bid confirmation                | [15](15.md)                            |
+| `1234`        | Draft Checkpoint                | [37](37.md)                            |
 | `1040`        | OpenTimestamps                  | [03](03.md)                            |
 | `1059`        | Gift Wrap                       | [59](59.md)                            |
 | `1063`        | File Metadata                   | [94](94.md)                            |
@@ -170,7 +171,6 @@ They exist to document what may be implemented by [Nostr](https://github.com/nos
 | `10006`       | Blocked relays list             | [51](51.md)                            |
 | `10007`       | Search relays list              | [51](51.md)                            |
 | `10009`       | User groups                     | [51](51.md), [29](29.md)               |
-| `10013`       | Draft relays                    | [37](37.md)                            |
 | `10015`       | Interests list                  | [51](51.md)                            |
 | `10019`       | Nutzap Mint Recommendation      | [61](61.md)                            |
 | `10030`       | User emoji list                 | [51](51.md)                            |
@@ -344,9 +344,9 @@ Please update these lists when proposing new NIPs.
 
 ## Is this repository a centralizing factor?
 
-To promote interoperability, we need standards that everybody can follow, and we need them to define a **single way of doing each thing** without ever hurting **backwards-compatibility**, and for that purpose there is no way around getting everybody to agree on the same thing and keep a centralized index of these standards. However the fact that such an index exists doesn't hurt the decentralization of Nostr. _At any point the central index can be challenged if it is failing to fulfill the needs of the protocol_ and it can migrate to other places and be maintained by other people.
+To promote interoperability, we standards that everybody can follow, and we need them to define a **single way of doing each thing** without ever hurting **backwards-compatibility**, and for that purpose there is no way around getting everybody to agree on the same thing and keep a centralized index of these standards. However the fact that such index exists doesn't hurt the decentralization of Nostr. _At any point the central index can be challenged if it is failing to fulfill the needs of the protocol_ and it can migrate to other places and be maintained by other people.
 
-It can even fork into multiple versions, and then some clients would go one way, others would go another way, and some clients would adhere to both competing standards. This would hurt the simplicity, openness and interoperability of Nostr a little, but everything would still work in the short term.
+It can even fork into multiple and then some clients would go one way, others would go another way, and some clients would adhere to both competing standards. This would hurt the simplicity, openness and interoperability of Nostr a little, but everything would still work in the short term.
 
 There is a list of notable Nostr software developers who have commit access to this repository, but that exists mostly for practical reasons, as by the nature of the thing we're dealing with the repository owner can revoke membership and rewrite history as they want -- and if these actions are unjustified or perceived as bad or evil the community must react.